Laptop Test

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, 24 February 2013

MEASUREMENTS: Logitech Squeezebox Touch. [Updated 2013-06-22]

Posted on 21:57 by Unknown

I got this unit late last year lightly used when Logitech announced the Touch's discontinuation. I notice it is quite hard to get one of these now and they're commanding quite an elevated price on eBay!

- Internal DAC chip: AKM4420

Setup: i7 computer system - same as Essence One. Analogue output from Touch going into the E-MU 0404USB for measurements.

Oscilloscope measurement of 1kHz square wave, 0dBFS off the analogue RCA output:
Nice clean waveform. 2.92V peak voltage. No significant channel imbalance noted.

Standard linear phase oversampling digital filter impulse response (16/44). Absolute polarity maintained.

RightMark Results:
Name:  Touch_Summary.png Views: 983 Size:  29.9 KB

Mostly better results all around compared to the SB3. Frequency response within tighter range over the 20-20kHz spectrum, noise levels 1 dB lower in the 16-bit domain (as if it could go any lower!?), and about -4dB lower with 24-bit data giving the Touch DAC about 17.5 bits of dynamic range. Interestingly, the stereo crosstalk is a bit higher in the Touch vs. SB3 by about 6-8 dB (remember, it's still down at -90dB).

Notice no significant difference between WiFi and wired through the ethernet.

Frequency Response:






16-bit audio vs. 24-bit audio. Looks good. Less bass drop-off than the SB3 with my equipment.


Noise Floor:




 THD Graphs:




Jitter (Dunn J-Test, WiFi):
16-bit:

24-bit:


Analogue outputs look very clean.

Summary:
I guess the only surprise is that the stereo crosstalk is higher in the Touch than the SB3. Otherwise, audio quality seems superior - it can obviously handle 96kHz natively (up to 192kHz with the EDO plug-in as a digital transport), and flatter frequency response especially in the low bass could be audible.

Again, assuming the WiFi strength is reliable and you're not constantly rebuffering, I see no indication that sound quality is negatively impacted by going wireless.

Subjectively, I like the Touch's sound. These days, it powers my bedroom system with SONY amp and Tannoy mX2 bookshelf speakers I got about 10 years ago. For what it is, I can't complain about these analogue output results - very competent! Although you can get better measuring noise floor, dynamic range, etc. with an outboard DAC, the Touch in its stock form is already very impressive and it would be wise to do some A-B testing before thinking an expensive DAC will improve the sound much!

For what you get, the bang-for-the-buck from this little device is fantastic and a shame really that it has been discontinued.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Getting There... (Early HT Room Setup)
    Back from my overseas business trip late last week. It's going to be really busy since I'll be moving to the new house in 1 week. Ma...
  • Information about Internet and its Uses in Our Daily Life
    Information about Internet and its Uses in Our Daily Life How difficult our life would have been if there was no Internet. Think about it. T...
  • MEASUREMENTS: Sony Playstation 1 (PS1) - SCPH-5501 as CD player.
    I got a kick out of this article by Stereophile awhile back (2008): http://www.stereophile.com/cdplayers/708play/ Imagine, audiophiles using...
  • MEASUREMENTS: Part I: Bit-Perfect Audiophile Music Players (Windows).
    Close to a month back, after publishing my TEAC UD-501 results , someone E-mailed me about the use of  JPLAY  with this DAC. Although I had ...
  • How to Transfer Pictures from Camera to Computer
    How to Transfer Pictures from Camera to Computer Despite the significant increase in storage capacity on memory cards in digital cameras, mo...
  • MEASUREMENTS: Part II: Bit-Perfect Audiophile Music Players - JPLAY (Windows).
    There's something happening here, What it is ain't exactly clear. -- Buffalo Springfield Welcome to Part II of the "Bit-Perfect...
  • MEASUREMENTS: TosLink digital optical audio cables.
    Let us now finish off testing the digital audio cables at my disposal. Already we're seen that USB  and coaxial SPDIF cables did not ha...
  • GUEST REVIEW & MEASUREMENTS: The Dr. Frank's "Best-Coaxial-Digital"™ SPDIF Cable.
    By Keaton I. Goulden-Eyre III, Esq. Two months ago, I had the good fortune to meet my independently wealthy friend Stephen at the local smok...
  • MEASUREMENTS: PCM to DSD Upsampling Effects (JRiver MC19 Beta).
    We're continuing to see a push into the DSD domain with renewed talk of music release as digital downloads requiring the purchase of a D...
  • MEASUREMENTS: Logitech Touch TT3 Mod.
    Here's some data on my Touch with Soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0 ( http://soundcheck-audio.blogspot.ca/...oolbox-30.html ) software ...

Categories

  • Apple
  • Computers Tutorials
  • FaceBook
  • Hardware
  • India
  • iTunes
  • Online Advertising
  • Web
  • Window XP Tips

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (62)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ▼  February (18)
      • MEASUREMENTS: AUNE X1 (Mark I) [UPDATED].
      • MEASUREMENTS: Oppo BDP-105 as USB DAC.
      • MEASUREMENTS: Asus XONAR Essence One [Updated June...
      • MEASUREMENTS: MUSE Mini TDA1543x4 NOS DAC! [UPDATED]
      • MEASUREMENTS: What 'lo-fi' looks like (SONY CFD-S05).
      • MEASUREMENTS: Logitech Squeezebox Boom & Radio.
      • MEASUREMENTS: Behringer DEQ2496.
      • MEASUREMENTS: Logitech Squeezebox Transporter [Upd...
      • MEASUREMENTS: Logitech Touch TT3 Mod.
      • MEASUREMENTS: Logitech Touch as transport!
      • MEASUREMENTS: Logitech Squeezebox Touch. [Updated ...
      • MEASUREMENTS: "Slim Devices" Squeezebox 3 [Updated...
      • MEASUREMENTS: E-MU 0404USB.
      • Musings & Gear Measurements Coming...
      • High Bitrate MP3 Internet Blind Test: Part 4 - SUB...
      • High Bitrate MP3 Internet Blind Test: Part 3 - DIS...
      • High Bitrate MP3 Internet Blind Test: Part 2 - RES...
      • High Bitrate MP3 Internet Blind Test: Part 1 - PRO...
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (2)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  May (1)
  • ►  2011 (33)
    • ►  August (33)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile